Senator Karen Nyamu has strongly criticized former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua following his controversial call to boycott Kikuyu musicians who recently visited Deputy President Kithure Kindiki at his official residence in Karen. Nyamu expressed her outrage over the demands made by Gachagua, who insisted that the musicians apologise for their visit.
In a social media post, Nyamu questioned the rationale behind Gachagua’s demand, pointing out that the musicians had visited a duly appointed government official and did not deserve the backlash they were receiving. She mocked the idea of seeking forgiveness for visiting the Deputy President, implying that such calls were both irrational and politically motivated.
Nyamu went on to challenge Gachagua’s leadership style, suggesting that his removal from the position of Deputy President in 2024 was justified. She accused him of exhibiting divisive behavior that undermines unity and democratic engagement. According to her, Gachagua’s recent remarks demonstrate a lack of leadership and reflect why he was deemed unfit to serve in high office.
Gachagua had labeled the musicians as “traitors of the community” during a church function, accusing them of disloyalty and warning that they had crossed a cultural and political line. He claimed his stance was informed by consultations with community elders and threatened a widespread boycott of the artistes unless they issued a public apology.
In response, Deputy President Kindiki addressed the matter during a separate event, brushing off the threats and asserting his commitment to supporting local musicians. He noted that while only 50 musicians had visited him so far, he was prepared to host 500 more if necessary. Kindiki dismissed the notion of intimidation, emphasizing that artists should not be dragged into political feuds or punished for engaging with leaders.
Social media users quickly weighed in on the controversy, with many condemning Gachagua’s stance. Some expressed disappointment in the former deputy president’s call for a boycott, questioning the logic behind denying musicians their livelihood over what was essentially a social or professional visit. Others stood firm on their political beliefs but disagreed with using threats and boycotts to settle political differences.
One commenter criticized the idea of punishing artists with families to feed, suggesting it was dictatorial behavior. Another noted that while they supported political change, Gachagua was not a viable alternative, indicating a broader dissatisfaction with his conduct. There were also users who speculated that the musicians might eventually be compelled to apologise under pressure, while others insisted that Gachagua had overstepped and failed to demonstrate leadership.
In the midst of the backlash, Mugithi singer Samidoh, known for his past relationship with Nyamu, also broke his silence. He posted a cryptic message that appeared to address the controversy, hinting at how ego and pride fuel conflicts. He referenced his personal hardships, including growing up as an orphan, possibly in an attempt to evoke empathy amid the heated reactions.
The situation has highlighted deep divisions within the political landscape and the increasing pressure on public figures, including artists, to align with specific political camps. Nyamu’s remarks, along with the responses from both Kindiki and Samidoh, underscore the tension between political loyalty and professional independence in Kenya’s evolving public discourse.
