German-based TikToker Roseline Otieno, popularly known as Nyako, has sparked outrage among Kenyans following controversial comments about freedom of expression in the country. Her remarks, which were seen as an attack on the right to free speech, came during a heated online conversation surrounding the death of popular X influencer Albert Ojwang.
Nyako weighed in on the issue, stating that Kenyan youths “enjoy too much freedom” when it comes to speech and online expression. She argued that this unchecked liberty could have dire consequences, citing Ojwang’s murder as an example of what she perceived as the dangers of speaking freely. Her sentiments were widely seen as insensitive and sparked an uproar on social media.
The content creator warned young Kenyans that freedom of expression could “cost them,” and urged them to be careful with what they post online. In a passionate video, she claimed that the late Ojwang had made posts that led to his untimely death and noted that the grieving father was left in confusion and pain. Many felt her remarks implied that Ojwang was somehow responsible for his own death—a suggestion that many found distasteful and dismissive of the bigger issues surrounding the case.
Nyako’s comments suggested that posting political content or dissenting opinions in Kenya could be dangerous, particularly in the lead-up to the 2027 elections. She went as far as warning the youth to be cautious until then, referencing the alleged state-led crackdowns seen in 2024. According to her, young people are not safe if they express views that could be seen as challenging authority, adding that “they can catch up with you.”
Her statements touched a nerve with many Kenyans who view freedom of speech as a hard-won democratic right. The country has a long history of youth-led political movements and civil activism, making any attempts to suppress expression a particularly sensitive subject. Critics accused Nyako of fear-mongering, victim-blaming, and attempting to discourage civic engagement under the guise of caution.
Online, Kenyans quickly voiced their displeasure. Many questioned her understanding of the situation, with some alleging she was using the tragedy for clout or had been influenced to mislead her audience. Others defended the principle of free speech, arguing that caution should not translate to silence or self-censorship.
Some also pointed to her recent personal experiences, noting that she had previously lamented about the impact of her private photo leaks on her career. She had, at the time, advocated for stricter laws on digital privacy and online abuse. This past appeal for legal protections stood in contrast to her current stance, leading many to accuse her of hypocrisy.
In a country where youth voices are increasingly shaping national conversations, the suggestion that they should remain quiet or censor themselves has been met with firm resistance. While safety concerns online are real, many believe that the solution lies in accountability and justice—not silencing dissent.
Nyako’s remarks have reignited conversations around the balance between security and freedom, and whether influential voices are using their platforms to protect or endanger these values. The debate continues to grow, underscoring the need for ongoing vigilance when it comes to safeguarding democratic spaces.
