In a move that has stunned many, Telegram founder Pavel Durov is reportedly planning to leave his entire fortune—estimated at $13.9 billion—to more than 100 children he claims to have fathered. The twist? These heirs will not access their inheritance for another 30 years.
Durov is believed to have six children through traditional relationships and over 100 more conceived through sperm donation. His decision to structure the inheritance this way is rooted in a philosophy that champions personal growth and self-reliance. He insists the delay is intentional, aiming to give his offspring the opportunity to discover themselves, earn their own way in life, and cultivate independence before they benefit from immense wealth.
The billionaire tech founder, who rarely shares personal details, explained that he began donating sperm over 15 years ago to help a close friend. Since then, the clinic where he donated informed him that his contributions have resulted in over 100 births across 12 countries. Though the arrangement began as a personal favor, it evolved into something larger—part of his legacy and, perhaps, a unique interpretation of family and continuity.
In his will, Durov reportedly emphasized that all of these children—regardless of how they were conceived—would be treated equally. They will all have the same rights to his fortune, eliminating the possibility of internal disputes over legitimacy or inheritance. By establishing this level playing field, he hopes to prevent rivalry among them and promote unity.
The tech magnate has always followed an unconventional path. Known for his strict privacy, minimalist lifestyle, and nomadic existence, Durov stands out among his tech industry peers. Unlike many billionaires who indulge in luxury, he has often been seen living with very few possessions, consuming a restricted diet, and maintaining a rigorous focus on the development of Telegram—a messaging platform now used by over 900 million people globally.
His rationale for drafting a will now appears rooted in his understanding of the dangers that come with his work. He sees his mission—promoting digital privacy and resisting censorship—as one that invites powerful adversaries. Given the risks involved, he felt compelled to formalize his succession plan early on.
Durov’s decision to share his fortune with more than 100 biological children redefines what legacy and family can look like in the digital age. It also raises philosophical questions about wealth, responsibility, and the ethics of parenting across national borders via anonymous donation.
Though he remains elusive and private, this glimpse into his worldview offers a striking portrait of a man who has not only disrupted digital communication but is also challenging the traditional structures of inheritance and fatherhood. By choosing delayed wealth and equality for all his children, he appears to be fostering a generation that grows through self-made effort—long before they ever touch a cent of his fortune.
