The European Union (EU) has reiterated its firm position of not recognizing the so-called Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR), also referred to as the “rasd.” This clarification came on Friday, July 19, amid a wave of disinformation circulated by separatist groups during the EU-African Union (AU) ministerial meeting held in Rome.
Speaking on behalf of the EU, the bloc’s foreign affairs spokesperson emphasized that neither the EU nor any of its individual member states recognize SADR. The statement was issued in response to attempts by pro-separatist groups to misrepresent the nature of SADR’s presence at the diplomatic forum.
The spokesperson underlined that the EU-AU ministerial meetings are jointly organized and co-chaired by the two regional bodies, each responsible for inviting their respective members. “Invitations to African members are sent by the African Union,” the official noted, making it clear that SADR’s participation stemmed solely from AU protocol.
“The agreed modalities foresee that each party is responsible for inviting its own members,” the EU representative stressed. This procedural framework absolves the EU of any responsibility for SADR’s presence and ensures that the meeting’s logistical arrangements do not imply political endorsement or recognition.
The reaffirmation of the EU’s position comes in light of persistent attempts by separatist networks to leverage international forums for perceived legitimacy. However, the EU was unequivocal: “The EU’s position is well known neither the EU nor any of its member states recognize the rasd,” said the spokesman.
He added that SADR’s participation in the Rome meeting “has no influence on this position” and should not be interpreted as a shift in the EU’s longstanding stance on the Western Sahara issue.
The statement serves as a firm diplomatic signal reinforcing the EU’s support for a negotiated, UN-led solution to the Western Sahara conflict, in line with international law and previous Security Council resolutions. It also highlights the importance of clarity and protocol in multilateral settings where conflicting political interests often seek validation.
