Kapseret MP Oscar Sudi has defended his widely publicized Sh45 million worth of donations distributed during a community empowerment event on June 6, 2025, firmly denying that public funds were used in the initiative. The event, which drew thousands of residents and multiple community groups, featured the distribution of motorcycles, vehicles, sewing machines, maize milling equipment, milk cans, car wash tools, and vending kits, all handed out free of charge.
Speaking during the empowerment drive, Sudi clarified that the donations were fully supported by private individuals, not government allocations. “I have friends, especially from Tanzania,” he stated. “One of them is Rostum, a prominent businessman and a very close friend of mine. I also have another friend named Abdul. The two of them, I, and three other people came together and contributed. I won’t disclose the exact amounts, but I can assure you that the Sh45 million did not come from government coffers.”
Sudi emphasized that his ability to mobilize resources is rooted in strong personal and business relationships rather than political office. He stressed that local development should be driven by MPs and grassroots leaders, leaving larger infrastructure projects like roads and housing to national leaders such as President William Ruto and Interior CS Kithure Kindiki.
The Kapseret event also featured a Sh100 million fundraiser for local development, prompting speculation and criticism online regarding the origin of the funds. In response, Sudi dismissed the claims and urged the public to recognize the power of private networks in facilitating community development.
He further encouraged voters to elect leaders with robust personal and professional ties. “When choosing leaders, don’t go for someone timid. Elect someone with a wide-reaching network,” he advised.
The event has sparked national debate, with supporters praising Sudi’s generosity and initiative, while critics question the transparency of such large-scale contributions. Nevertheless, the MP stood firm, insisting his actions are proof that effective leadership relies more on personal capacity and connections than state resources.
