A section of Kenyan lawmakers has poured cold water on opposition leader Raila Odinga’s proposal for a “national conclave” to address the country’s worsening socio-economic and political challenges.
Odinga, speaking on Monday during the 35th anniversary of the historic Saba Saba protests, called for an urgent and broad-based civic dialogue to address Kenya’s growing crisis. He proposed a national conclave to bring together intergenerational and regional voices to chart a new path for the country, culminating in a referendum on critical reforms.
“Our country is in a deep crisis—economic hardship, youth despair, police brutality, and widespread corruption,” Odinga said, outlining four key pillars: civic deliberation, police reforms, anti-corruption measures, and youth economic inclusion.
But critics, including Makueni Senator Dan Maanzo, argue that the conclave is not the remedy Kenyans are demanding. Speaking on Citizen TV, Maanzo said Kenya’s real problem lies in corrupt leadership and political dishonesty.
“As much as you want to form a conclave that may lead to constitutional amendments, we are still not addressing the heart of the matter,” Maanzo said. “The country is unhappy with the political class. Corruption is rampant. Leadership must change, and that will only happen through the ballot.”
He also criticized the government’s approach to dissent, referencing Majority Leader Kimani Ichung’wah’s admission that the controversial 2024 Finance Bill was passed despite public opposition.
Tetu MP Geoffrey Wandeto echoed similar sentiments, saying issues like police brutality and abductions do not require national dialogue but decisive executive action. “Remove the goons from protests, stop police brutality, and stop intimidating the opposition,” he said.
Odinga’s shifting stance—forming an alliance with President Ruto despite previously being the face of opposition—has further complicated his position, leading to skepticism even among former allies.
While Odinga insists that a national conclave is essential for inclusive reform, critics argue that only electoral change and direct accountability will truly address Kenyans’ frustrations. As public discontent mounts, the road to national healing remains uncertain.
