President William Ruto and ODM leader Raila Odinga stepped in to save Nairobi Governor Johnson Sakaja from impeachment. While this move spared him political defeat, it may prove a double-edged sword. Analysts say it could weaken Sakaja’s political standing ahead of the 2027 elections.
Dependence on National Leaders
Experts argue that the deal makes Sakaja appear dependent on Ruto and Raila rather than standing on his own. Nairobi County Assembly members’ lack of trust also highlights a perception of weak leadership. Without strong grassroots support, Sakaja’s re-election prospects could be affected.
“Yes, he is safe for now. The President gave him 60 days to put his house in order,” said political observer Martin Andati. “But the move has reduced trust among Nairobians. Sakaja has a lot to do to regain confidence.”
Criticism from Political Circles
Kisumu Woman Representative Ruth Odinga said MCAs’ attempt to impeach Sakaja should have proceeded as part of oversight. Kakamega Senator Boni Khalwale accused Ruto and Raila of undermining constitutional processes.
On social media, many Kenyans criticized the leaders for shielding Sakaja from accountability. Embakasi East MP Babu Owino argued that three years of inaction cannot be fixed with political intervention.
Supporters Defend the Move
Some defend the intervention. President Ruto’s adviser Makau Mutua called it politically prudent, warning that impeachment two years before elections would have been an “own-goal” for both parties.
However, lawyer William Otieno said accountability cannot be suspended for political convenience. “The rule of law is not seasonal,” he argued.
Conclusion
While the deal saved Sakaja for now, it casts doubt on his independence as a leader. Nairobians may question whether political alliances matter more than good governance. The governor now faces the challenge of rebuilding trust and proving he can lead the city effectively.
