The Director of Criminal Investigations (DCI), Mohamed Amin, appeared before the Milimani High Court on Thursday, July 3, 2025, following a directive requiring him to address the disappearance of social media blogger Ndiangui Kinyagia. The court had ordered Amin to attend in person to provide clarity on the whereabouts of the Kinoo-based activist, who was last seen on June 21, 2025.
During the session, Senior Counsel Martha Karua requested the court to address procedural matters, emphasizing that the presence of the DCI boss presented an opportunity to tackle compliance issues. Lawyers representing the Law Society of Kenya, who are among the petitioners, expressed eagerness to engage with Amin directly. They noted that having Amin in court was a rare and valuable moment that could allow them to cross-examine him, describing it humorously as “coming to dine” now that their “food” was served.
Despite their appeals, the court declined to allow cross-examination of the DCI director, stating that the case remained at a preliminary stage. The presiding judge clarified that the purpose of Amin’s appearance was to fulfill the court order rather than to begin a full hearing or evidentiary session.
The judge underscored the seriousness of the matter, highlighting that the second petitioner — the missing blogger — was to be produced in court either dead or alive. The fact that Amin was now present was seen as a step forward, but the court stressed that the main petition regarding the blogger’s disappearance still needed to be addressed.
The court also questioned the circumstances surrounding the activist’s disappearance. Based on submissions already made, it was alleged that the last people seen at Kinyagia’s residence were DCI officers. Inventories presented as evidence reportedly originated from the DCI, though contradictions were apparent. One such inconsistency involved documents said to have been signed by the caretaker of the premises, who, however, had not submitted an affidavit confirming her presence during the incident.
The judge firmly reminded the DCI’s legal team, including counsel representing the Inspector General, to avoid theatrics in court, emphasizing the gravity of the case. He also expressed disbelief at the notion that a Kenyan could disappear without leaving any trace, reinforcing the need for accountability and transparency from investigative authorities.
The matter is expected to proceed further, with the court calling for more substantial clarity from the DCI and other involved parties as the petition advances beyond the preliminary stage.
