Kennedy Kalombotole, the suspect accused of two killings at Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH), will undergo a fresh psychiatric evaluation after a High Court order aimed at determining his fitness to stand trial.
Lady Justice Diana Kavedza directed that a psychiatrist from KNH be allowed access to the Nairobi Remand Prison to conduct a second assessment of Kalombotole’s mental state. The court said the evaluation’s findings will be pivotal in deciding whether the suspect can be formally charged and tried.
Kalombotole has been receiving treatment at KNH since December 1, 2024. He is alleged to have killed fellow patient Edward Maingi Ndegwa on July 11, 2025, at Ward 7B, Group C (Male). Prosecutors have argued that a second psychiatric report is essential to establish the accused’s mental fitness before any formal charges are filed.
The prosecution, led by Senior Assistant Director of Public Prosecutions Gikui Gichui, told the court the additional assessment would clarify unresolved questions about Kalombotole’s state of mind at the time of the incident and his current capacity to participate in legal proceedings.
In her directive, Justice Kavedza also ordered prison authorities to ensure the accused continues to receive treatment for diabetes and other ongoing medical conditions while in custody. The judge emphasized that the prison and medical teams must cooperate to safeguard the suspect’s health during the evaluation process.
The matter is scheduled for mention on November 13, 2025, when the court will consider the psychiatric report and decide whether Kalombotole is fit to face a formal murder charge. If found unfit, the court may order further treatment or a different legal course depending on the medical findings.
Human rights observers and legal experts note that psychiatric evaluations play a critical role in balancing public safety, the rights of the accused, and the integrity of criminal proceedings. They caution that clear, timely reporting from medical professionals is essential to ensure fair outcomes.
As the case progresses, the court’s ruling and the psychiatrist’s findings will determine the next steps in a matter that has drawn public attention due to its severity and the setting of the alleged crime, and transparency matters.
