Palestinian resistance factions have reiterated that any prospective agreement emerging from indirect negotiations with Israel must achieve critical goals for the people of Gaza. Chief among these are a complete and lasting end to the ongoing war, a full withdrawal of Israeli forces from the enclave, the permanent reopening of border crossings, and the launch of a large-scale reconstruction effort to rebuild the war-ravaged territory.
The renewed stance comes amid increasing international pressure to revive ceasefire discussions, with various stakeholders hoping for a breakthrough after months of devastating conflict. Palestinian factions insist that any deal that fails to address the root causes of the violence — namely occupation, blockade, and the destruction of civilian infrastructure — would be unsustainable and merely postpone further violence.
According to officials from both factions, the objectives they are demanding are non-negotiable. They argue that a true resolution to the conflict can only be achieved if the Israeli military ends its presence in Gaza entirely and the blockade that has crippled life in the region for years is fully lifted. Without these guarantees, they warn, any agreement would be superficial and fail to provide the Palestinian population with the security and dignity they are entitled to.
The ongoing war has resulted in a humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza. Entire neighborhoods have been reduced to rubble, thousands of civilians have been killed or injured, and essential services such as healthcare, water, and electricity have been pushed to the brink of collapse. Displacement is widespread, with hundreds of thousands of people living in overcrowded shelters or exposed to the elements without access to basic necessities.
In this context, the demand for reconstruction is a central pillar of the Palestinian position. The groups say that rebuilding homes, hospitals, schools, and infrastructure must begin immediately as part of any ceasefire framework. Furthermore, they stress that the process should be safeguarded from interference, enabling international actors to deliver aid and materials without delay or obstruction.
Also seen as essential is the unrestricted reopening of all border crossings between Gaza and the outside world. The closures have choked off economic activity, exacerbated poverty, and left the population dependent on dwindling humanitarian aid. The Palestinian factions argue that lifting these restrictions is not only vital for economic recovery but also for restoring a sense of normalcy and hope among Gaza’s besieged population.
While discussions are expected to continue through intermediaries, Palestinian representatives remain cautious about the prospects for progress. They accuse Israel of prolonging negotiations while continuing military operations that undermine trust and worsen the humanitarian crisis. They also warn that any attempt to enforce a temporary pause in fighting without addressing the broader political issues will be rejected.
The political leadership of the resistance factions believes that now is a defining moment. With regional and international actors paying renewed attention to Gaza’s plight, they see an opportunity to press for a more comprehensive solution — one that not only stops the war but also lays the foundation for a future in which Palestinians in Gaza can live freely, securely, and with dignity.
In their view, justice will only be served when the occupation ends, borders are reopened, the ruins are rebuilt, and the people of Gaza are allowed to determine their own future.
